Should we add a non-canon version this page? --—NWG 22:23, January 25, 2016 (UTC)
In my opinion, nah. This is a disambiguation page (that has more information than a disambiguation page should). If we removed the disambig classification, then I wouldn't have a problem with a non-canon subpage. ★WindStar7125 22:29, January 25, 2016 (UTC)